Klingon Imperial Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
05 24, 2012, 12:28: PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Thu 28Aug2008 22:30 PDT:
    Guest access restored.
11538 Posts in 1551 Topics by 820 Members
Latest Member: sarakkatz
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Klingon Imperial Forums
|-+  Klingon Language & Culture
| |-+  Klingon Religion & Beliefs
| | |-+  Klingon law - Security
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Klingon law - Security  (Read 3554 times)
Tedra_deArr
Senior Courier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 84



WWW
« on: 09 25, 2004, 05:21: AM »

okay in our rolegame we got a problem, The security chief is only lagh.

Then we got 3 Q's in our arrest department.

So because they made the aj drunken, she now want to kill them. (not that it would work, but anyway). Now she and a HoD come in and want the CoS to deactivate the Forcefield, so that they can shoot them.

Must he do that (aj way higher than lagh) or is he allowed to disobey, cause the orders go against all security.

 Sad  Sad  Sad  Sad

Wher could I find some stuff of klingon law?


oh the aj is head of the whole station, i forgot to mention that
« Last Edit: 09 28, 2004, 03:30: AM by Kesvirit » Logged

Sometimes you have to punch your way through - Captain Kathryn Janeway

Empire of Warriors ORPG, "chal che'wI' tengchaH (Star Ruler space station) " - join us now
Kesvirit
Her Nibbs
Administrator
Thought Master
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1155


That which does not kill me, must have missed me.


WWW
« Reply #1 on: 09 26, 2004, 01:15: AM »

It will help if you first clarify your terms for those who are not familiar with tlhIngan Hol or the specifics of the game. I assume that:

{lagh} -- ensign
{HoD} -- captain
CoS -- Chief of Security (?)

By "aj" do you mean {'aj}, as in "admiral"? Or is it an abbreviation for something, perhaps "adjunct _____ " or "assistant _____ "?

I would think that the security chief would be justified in refusing to follow his superiors' orders if they go against established rules and procedures. However, he would have to confront his drunken commanding officer and a captain in order to do his duty.  

I think there is no clear-cut answer to this. It is more an issue of character dynamics than the letter of the law and will all depend on the character of the security chief. Does he have what it takes to face down the aj?  Is he ready to die to do his duty?  If so, what other motivations might he have to protect his prisoners from his superiors?

-=- Kesvirit
Logged

Richard the Sound Guy: "And the next person to lecture me about canon risks getting shot out of one! Right, gaffers?"
Gaffers make appreciative and supportive remarks in the form of bad imitations of primate calls from the direction of the lighting grids.
Tedra_deArr
Senior Courier
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 84



WWW
« Reply #2 on: 09 29, 2004, 11:47: AM »

Quote
It will help if you first clarify your terms for those who are not familiar with tlhIngan Hol or the specifics of the game. I assume that:

{lagh} -- ensign
{HoD} -- captain
CoS -- Chief of Security (?)

yep all like this

and I meant with aj -> 'aj -> general

mfg

oh I forgot our station is like this:

'aj as head of whole station/fleet and boss of HotS
-->an ech as head of the station core (HotS) and boss of all the deparment heads like the CoS.
--->the several departments and their heads like the CoS
----->staff

something like this.

the HoD is fleet and not station, so no relation there to the CoS
« Last Edit: 09 29, 2004, 10:33: PM by Kesvirit » Logged

Sometimes you have to punch your way through - Captain Kathryn Janeway

Empire of Warriors ORPG, "chal che'wI' tengchaH (Star Ruler space station) " - join us now
Abbot Nej vIt
Highly Opinionated Klingon
Thought Master
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 790


"I Will Take the Conquerer Ceasers Salad... Now!"


WWW
« Reply #3 on: 04 18, 2005, 03:42: PM »

I Would Hazzard to add that in General it is Easier to Get Forgivness, than Permission, Except, that in this Case We are Talking about Klingons, who Drunk or Not, Do not like to be Told No... So The Consequences of Disobeying a Direct Order Could be Deadly...

In Human Terms if a Real Airman, Marine, Sailor or Soldier Disobeys a Lawful Order they are in For it, Even if they Think it might be Wrong. And As I Recall of my own Military Service we were Told as early as basic Training that, we should Follow the Most Recent Direct Order from One of Higher Rank, And Follow it up Later As Needed, but that We Could Request "Authorization" of that Order.

Rather Klingon or Real World, I Should think that "Slowing things Down" By Being Sure of what you are Doing, to be the Best Solution... In the Case Listed Here, I Would Expect that Anyone Who was Chief of Security, Would have a Good Working Knowledge of the Expectations of their C.O. and If Unable to Deal With An Angry Drunken Officer, they Probably do not "Need" to be in Charge there. Remember, Klingons are Expected to Defend themselves...
Logged

Archbishop Nej vIt SutaI-H'Nter,
Spiritual Advisor to K.L.A.W. 4th Fleet,
Abbot, Dugh toy'wI' Library,
http://www.klingonlegion.com/summergames2006/
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!