How are you supposed to describe things with no adjectives?

[torqey]

How are you supposed to describe things with no adjectives? What if I wanted to say, "Furry dog"? How would I say that?

[jIHaD]

Well, there's no word for "dog," but generally, the verb for "to be <adjective>" is just placed after the noun being described by the adjective.
Alternately, you can use the suffix -bogh "which."
Or, nouns may be used as adjectives, as in the popular song veD SuD DaS "Green Furry Boots" (ter'eS's work, "Blue Suede Shoes" in Klingon).

Example:
"red helmet" could be either:
mIv Doq "red helmet"
Doqbogh mIv "helmet which is red"

[ter'eS]

Or, nouns may be used as adjectives, as in the popular song veD SuD DaS "Green Furry Boots" (ter'eS's work, "Blue Suede Shoes" in Klingon).

Just to be clear, veD SuD DaS doesn't use a noun as an adjective. veD SuD is noun + adjective, "fur" + "green", or "green fur". This is then used in a Noun1-Noun2 possessive relationship: (veD SuD) DaS, meaning "boot(s) (made) of green fur."  The "possessive" N1-N2 form not only shows ownership, but things like composition and origin, as well, but both nouns are still nouns.

[torqey]

Thankyou for the speedy replies everyone. They really helped.

[jIHaD]

Or, nouns may be used as adjectives, as in the popular song veD SuD DaS "Green Furry Boots" (ter'eS's work, "Blue Suede Shoes" in Klingon).

Just to be clear, veD SuD DaS doesn't use a noun as an adjective. veD SuD is noun + adjective, "fur" + "green", or "green fur". This is then used in a Noun1-Noun2 possessive relationship: (veD SuD) DaS, meaning "boot(s) (made) of green fur."  The "possessive" N1-N2 form not only shows ownership, but things like composition and origin, as well, but both nouns are still nouns.

I understand.
What I meant was that, in cases like that, the nouns sort of do the adjectives' jobs.